Candace Owens: Tyler Robinson’s Family Rejects FBI Narrative, Calls Case a “Setup”
By XMN News Investigative Desk
Conservative commentator Candace Owens has amplified shocking claims from the family of Tyler Robinson, the man federal authorities say is linked to the death of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
According to Owens, Robinson’s relatives firmly reject the FBI’s version of events. They insist that the images released by the Bureau in connection with Kirk’s killing do not depict Tyler at all, but someone else entirely.
Family Denies FBI Claims
Robinson’s family has also dismissed the notion that he played any role in Kirk’s death. Instead, they believe his residence was deliberately staged to frame him following his arrest, pointing to what they describe as inconsistencies and planted evidence inside his apartment.
“The FBI’s story doesn’t add up,” Owens told her audience, summarizing the family’s concerns. “They are saying this was not Tyler, and that the so-called evidence is a setup.”
A Case That Shook Conservative Circles
The death of Charlie Kirk sent shockwaves through conservative political circles in the United States. Federal investigators quickly moved to present Robinson as a central figure, releasing surveillance images and detailing alleged links between him and Kirk’s death.
But the counter-narrative emerging from Robinson’s family, now spotlighted by Owens, threatens to complicate public perception of the case — particularly among Kirk’s supporters, many of whom are demanding transparency and accountability.
Questions About Staged Evidence
Owens emphasized that the family’s biggest concern is the possibility of manufactured evidence. They claim the apartment’s condition following Robinson’s detention appeared suspicious, raising doubts about whether law enforcement or other actors may have staged the scene to secure a conviction.
“The family is not just saying Tyler is innocent,” Owens stressed. “They’re saying this whole thing was orchestrated.”
FBI Response
As of now, the FBI has not issued a direct response to these allegations. Federal officials previously maintained that the evidence against Robinson was strong, but critics argue that the Bureau has yet to provide sufficient transparency to quiet growing doubts.
What’s Next?
Owens has vowed to keep pressing the issue, suggesting that the Robinson case may become a broader test of public trust in federal law enforcement. Meanwhile, supporters of both Kirk and Robinson await further developments, as the case continues to raise troubling questions about motive, accountability, and truth.